As I have posted before, there is move afoot to fund the school budget from sources other than the appropriation at Town Meeting. Specifically, the discussion is to use any remaining balance in the FY08 Reserve Fund for the school's textbook and technology needs in FY09. This idea has now reached the stage...
...where may be put to a "sense of Town Meeting" vote at the Town Meeting next week. The following is my comment to the Finance Committee on the idea of using those monies.
As you all know, both the Select Board and Finance Committee have adopted policies (as recommended by the state DOR in their report last year) that one time non-recurring revenue would not be used to fund recurring expense. Here are some excerpts from the Finance Committee policy:
"It is the primary goal of the Dartmouth Finance Committee to ensure that budgets are fiscally responsible and sustainable"
"The largest problem area has been the trend of increasing reliance on one time revenues to pay for recurrent operating budgets"
"One time revenues should only be applied to: Capital improvements, property acquisitions, contributions to the stabilization fund and single year casualties"
"Budgets established in the spring town meeting should be considered to be "fully funded.""
In my opinion, the possible remainder in the Reserve Fund is not recurring revenue (Can anyone predict the amount that will remain at the end of FY09?) and the needs for books and technology in the school department is a recurring expense. While the Finance Committee is within its authority to provide these funds (assuming a request is made from the school department), I think we need to openly acknowledge that we are going to violate the policy as it now exists. Some may try to characterize this as not being the case, but I, for one, will call a spade, a spade.
Additionally, the school department has not taken steps to solve this problem within their budget. The DOE foundation budget calculation sets out a recommended spending amount for the Dartmouth schools for instructional materials and technology. The result of that calculation comes to $1.9 million dollars. Those interested can find the DOE information at this link. As far as I can determine, the school department budgets a small fraction of that amount. That is their prerogative, of course. The FY09 school budget does not adequately plan to update their instructional materials and technology while it does fund extracurricular activities, new positions, etc. Providing the Reserve Fund remainder to provide instructional materials and technology while the money needed to fund ongoing replacement of these items is spent elsewhere in the school budget is precisely the outcome that the adopted policy sought to prevent. The budget is not sustainable! Should we throw a patch at it and hope, or take steps to correct the root problem? I am for the latter. If this comes before the Town Meeting next week, I will speak against it for the reasons as stated here
As always, I welcome your feedback in comments
Click here to read on!