We have been having a little discussion here about what plans are required and which are being worked on at present. I would like to take a step back and address why I believe this fiscal plan is needed. Up to this date, the town has been reacting to shortfalls in the yearly budget. First, we took our reserves and spent them to fund on-going operations of the town. When the reserves were gone, we starting asking the voters for overrides, warning that services would be deeply cut if the override failed. It did and some cuts were made. A large part of the DPW expense was moved to the Solid Waste Enterprise fund. Fees for that service and others in the schools and town were introduced. Finally, other overrides were put forward amid the same warnings of deep cuts to services. This spring, a modest override passed and the town has a few months of breathing space ...
...before next year when we will face another shortfall. All these activities share a common feature. They are reactive. The shortfalls are at hand and measures are taken that react in the short term. But our fiscal problem is not a temporary situation, it is due to the fact that our expense growth is exceeding our revenue growth year after year. For reasons which I have written about here and here, it is difficult to raise revenue to meet the expenses. The solution is to cut the rate of growth of expense to within that of revenue. If you will concede that point for the sake of argument, then the next question is how much do we need to cut the rate of growth of expense? What is does that reduction of the rate of expense growth equal in dollars and where can we find that in the budget? That's where a forward looking plan is crucial. By estimating our revenues and expenses right now, we can begin to proactively make changes to our spending in order to avoid future shortfalls. It will tell us how much of a deficit to expect and where we can focus our efforts to eliminate it. For example, changing to biweekly payroll can save the town some expense. That savings will be modest and should be pursued but it will not cover our FY10 shortfall. Negotiating a less expensive health care package could save a lot. So when making decisions for collective bargaining, a fiscal forecast can inform what we ask for. (Let me caution that, to my knowledge, these are examples and not a position that the town is taking in current contract negotiations) In a few short months, the Fall Town Meeting will be upon us and I think that there will be requests to use reserved funds and departmental turn backs for on going operational expenses. Back to the reactive mode! A fiscal forecast will allow us to take a longer perspective on the use of those funds. How does spending that money this year affect the next? Will we need those funds for FY10? I can't tell you right now because that information is not readily available. A multi-year fiscal forecast is needed to answer these questions and that is why it must be completed as soon as possible.
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Why is a plan needed?
Posted by
Bill Trimble
at
8:54 PM
15 VIEWERS CLICKED HERE TO COMMENT ON THIS POST. ADD YOUR COMMENT.
Labels:
Budget,
leadership
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
Mr. Trimble, could you request that the weekly meeting schedule be updated? I hate to sound like a broken record but why is this simple, simple task beyond our town's ability to complete???? Surely each committee is responsible for alerting the town clerk or exec administrator of their schedule weeks in advance? It should then be a simple matter of updating the calender the week prior. Most every other community issues monthly calenders on their site so people can plan accordingly.
This town has been too long without a plan. It makes good sense and I wish it had been addressed years ago. This is in the town charter(2000). Thank you to Bev Days for her letter in the S-Times. Many others have asked for a plan before, but it went nowhere. Thank you Bill.
If as Mr. Gagne claims we do have a plan, then it is a poor one. We have had two recent opportunities on both the town side & the school side to start changing employee salaries/benefits and in both cases the status quo prevailed. There was no need or justification for the starting salaries that were given to these two individuals. When are our town leaders going to get it??? And where were town meeting members last fall when they could have set the salary for the town clerk position?
Awesome W Genny girls lax pic.
What kind of tax break are we giving Walgreens to build at the crossroads? This is a pefect time to establish a fair arrangement for the both the town and the business. I hope their are no special TIFF deals.
The town has said there will be no more TIFs handed out, so I expect this will be no different. When Target came to town and Shaw's reconstructed, the town made them pay for any infrastructure work needed also. This is a clear departure from history, and about time too. Faunce Corner cost the taxpayers a small fortune.
Only the town meeting can give a TIF. In the past, the SB has given TIFs with the idea that it would get a rubber stamp from town meeting, but town meeting sent a clear message that this is not going to happen anymore.
Al TIFs (Tax Incentive Financing) must also be approved by Town Meeting which has been reluctant to do so. But it is better if we go in with no TIF and avoid the whole matter. How many pharmacies do you need?
The Planning Board and perhaps the ZBA are the bodies which will deal with the infrastructure. They should make sure that any improvements are part of the building permit so that they are enforced. In the past, conditions placed on some projects have not been completed. By placing them on the building permit, we will have a positive check that they are done.
TIF's can be a good thing. Dartmouth needs more revenue as has been discussed for a long time now, the store will create more jobs for townspeople and it's very convenient to have a multitude of pharmacies from which to choose. I'm all for doing whatever we can to entice more franchises to come to Dartmouth - hell why not. Before long Dartmouth will be among the nameless faceless towns that all look alike across the country. Where am I? Denver, Houston, Binghamton or Dartmouth? Does'nt matter it all looks alike.
no tif according to Mike and Ed but its easier to complain than ask
How about a new lead in discussion. This is getting stale. Anybody noticing how bad the economy is getting and how fast it is changing? We are about to see a huge burst in this country. Alternative energy has got to be at the forefront of everyone's mind.
Mark my words, this upcoming is goin to be one of the worst social impacs we have seen since the great depression. There is no end in sight on fuel prices. Natural Gas has not even started its' meteoric rise yet. You see what's happening to the Auto industry. The one good thing although painful is; the auto industry is being forced to reengineer their objectives. They have some of the smartest creative people that should be focusing their efforts on the next generation of efficient vehicles. People in in our area have to get their head out of their a_ _ es and start approving wind and solar projects that can make an impact relatively quickly. The government should provide grant money and assistance to those states willing to take the next bold step. There should be a huge wind farm off the whole southcoast region from Westport to the cape. It is embarrasing that it failed in the first place. We are talking about survival here not aesthetic value.
Bill, are you there?
Certain people have been saying the economy is going into the toilet for the past couple of years but the pro-override people have chosen to ignore it. I don't think we'll have to worry about any overrides passing for quite some time. I can't believe our town leaders would even put one on the ballot but looking back at their other poor decisions it shouldn't surprise anyone.
sorry anonymous - won't bite.
Word on the street is that an override ballot "is being considered" for the fall.
Post a Comment