Thursday, April 2, 2009

MOB file in advance of tonight's Finance Committee meeting

Mr. Lynam has been working diligently, as always, to keep this file updated. A daunting task around budget time as new information arrives daily. This is a link to the newest update dated 4/1/09. As always, I have deleted previous version from the server as my storage space is limited and it is a large file.

Previous posting links to the MOB file are now inoperative. As I am typing this, it occurs to me that I should rename the file and save the latest version to the server and then use that name in all future posts. That way the links would all work and only the latest would be available. I'll go that route in the future.

9 comments:

Gilbert Story a Must Read said...

On Feb. 4, it was reported in The Standard-Times that Ed Iacaponi had been offered the position of interim executive administrator by Select Board Chairman Joe Michaud and Select Board member Diane Gilbert. The decision to offer Mr. Iacaponi the position had never been discussed or voted upon by the entire Select Board at that time.
Besides what I feel is a clear violation of the state’s Open Meeting Law, what I found to be the most appalling is that Gilbert publicly reprimanded Michaud for making this information public by calling the Standard Times.
She conveniently forgot to mention publicly that she also participated in this meeting to offer the interim position to Mr. Iacaponi.
It is interesting that she is currently running for re-election to the Select Board on a transparent and open government platform, yet she remains publicly silent regarding what I feel is a violation. An elected official, especially one who is running on a transparent and open government platform, she cannot pick and choose when to publicly expose an issue regarding transparency.
But no one should be surprised by Gilbert’s actions. They are not unprecedented.
Back in early 2008 during the much debated issue regarding a split tax rate -- an issue vehemently opposed by Diane Gilbert -- she wrote a letter to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue without first notifying her fellow Select Board members. In her complaint, she criticized the Select Board’s behavior and the manner in which they handled the debate by allowing the public to have a voice in the decision.
Think about this for a moment, we the taxpaying citizens according to Gilbert should not have been allowed to have our opinion heard in a public forum on how we should be taxed. There is something inherently wrong with this philosophy and tactic.
What this illustrates is Gilbert’s propensity to pick and choose when transparency is appropriate. Transparency must always be appropriate whether it works for you or against you.
Gilbert has had a lot to say regarding transparency in Dartmouth politics, and it has been illustrated that she has an incredible ability to turn a blind eye to transparency when it suits her needs.
The time for this double standard must come to an end in Dartmouth. We must as a community move forward by electing the right people to the Select Board to bring back transparency and collaboration back to our community, for that is what is needed most in these trying times.
We, the voting citizens of Dartmouth, now have our chance to decide how our community will tackle the issues we face. Will it be one of transparency and collaboration or selective transparency and divisiveness? The choice is yours at the polls on April 7th.

Bill Trimble said...

This comment is complete nonsense. Ms. Gilbert has been a consistent and unwavering advocate for the public's right to know. Citing the Open Meeting law regarding the interaction of two members of the Select Board and the Budget Director is just factually incorrect. There can be no meeting of the Select Board without a quorum of three members present. There was no Select Board quorum, hence no violation is possible. After the two met with Mr. Iacaponi and reported back to the Select Board that he was amenable to taking on the task, there was a open meeting and debate on his appointment. Ms. Gilbert's contact with the DOR was an inquiry about the propriety of public statements by Select Board members in advance of a public hearing about the split tax. Her concern there was once again that all sides be heard. It was not an attempt to quell debate but to postpone it to an appropriate forum. No group has been more divisive than those who are opposing. I conclude that their agenda is to get a property tax override passed since they have little other policy difference with Ms. Gilbert. They will not come out and say so,instead citing a broader perspective on fiscal responsibilty or other vague language.

Anonymous said...

The 3 G's!!

zwj said...

You know, the guy that spoke against the split tax while with the chamber of commerce then flipped when his bread got buttered with grant money. He tried the exact same type of attack in another forum and got his butt whipped in that debate also.

zwj said...

Thanks Bill, That ridiculous attack against Gilbert has got Jim Mathes' fingerprints all over it. You know, the guy that spoke against the split tax while with the chamber of commerce then flipped when his bread got buttered with grant money. He tried the exact same type of attack in another forum and got his butt whipped in that debate also.

Anonymous said...

I would like to know why some departments are losing employees, and other departments are not. It seems to me that the departments that are bringing in the revenue are the ones losing help, This should not be. Also, how come, the collector's office, employees totalling about eight and you always have to wait in long lines and they bring in what $2,000.00, it seems if you are affiliated with Finance you can do whatever you want and get rewarded. We also know that finance and select board are together, very interesting.

Anonymous said...

FinCom and Select Board are working together? What planet are you from?

Anonymous said...

Why you waiting in line? at the collectors office? must be Jim mathes fault

Anonymous said...

well lets see how the budget changes now - will we see level funding in departments with the new Select Board members, and then tell me the Select Board & Finance Committee are not in the same boat, since now hopefully it will be 3-2, the other way, oh yeah I forgot, Lara is good friends with Joe, so it could be 4-1